AI Search Engines vs. Google: The Impact On Local SEO
The Impact of AI on Google and SEO: Are Local Search Dynamics Shifting?
In recent weeks, there’s been significant buzz about how emerging AI-driven search engines, like SearchGPT, could impact Google and SEO. Gary Vaynerchuk even compared today’s evolution in search engines to the disruption that web crawlers caused to traditional yellow pages—a big shift in how people find information.
What?!

This advancement in search technology (AI search vs. traditional search) is not as revolutionary as web crawlers' effect on physical books; that represented an entirely new technology.
It's more similar to the relationship between TikTok and Instagram, with ample room for multiple search engines to coexist for different user bases and types of content. A more competitive search industry without Google dominance will likely lead to a better search experience for users too.
Below we evaluate the current influence of SearchGPT on local SEO, partcularly healthcare searches.
Weekly Search Volumes: SearchGPT vs. Google
Currently, ChatGPT has about 200 million active worldwide users compared to Google’s 4.3 billion. Notably, SearchGPT is available only to paying users—roughly 5% of ChatGPT’s active weekly users, totalling about 10 million. This translates to a mere 0.23% of Google’s weekly search activity, meaning AI-driven search tools are still in their infancy in terms of volume.
For now, the impact on Google’s search traffic appears minimal. But this could shift, so staying informed on AI search developments is essential.
Types of Online Searches: Informational vs. Commercial

Unlike Google, which presents local listings and comprehensive search results, AI-driven tools like SearchGPT deliver quick, conversational answers, making them better suited for informational queries, such as "best neck pain remedies while sleeping" or "best exercises for seniors".
For commercial searches—like “physio near me” or “sciatica treatment London”—Google offers a more robust experience by integrating maps, business profiles, reviews, and website links. Therefore, if AI search tools begin to capture more traffic, they’ll likely start by attracting informational search volume rather than commercial, meaning limited immediate impact commercial searches and therefore local business revenue.
Challenges with Local Search on SearchGPT
Early feedback on AI-driven search tools shows inconsistencies in local search results presentation. For instance, SearchGPT lacks a familiar map or list interface for local searches, often linking out to Google Maps or providing results in a less structured way. This can create a clunky experience for users accustomed to Google’s smooth, map-based layout for location-based queries.
As long as SearchGPT lacks this consistency, users may still rely heavily on Google for local searches, which is beneficial for clinics relying on local visibility.
Google’s Advantage in Filtering and Review Visibility
One of Google’s strengths in local search is its robust filtering and review visibility. When searching for a service, users can easily filter results by factors such as ratings and business hours—key in choosing a healthcare provider. Currently, SearchGPT lacks such customisation options, which are essential for user trust and decision-making.
If users begin using AI-driven searches for general information but still turn to Google for local or review-based searches, clinics may not see an impact. For now, clinics maintain strong visibility on Google’s platform, as long as AI-driven tools don’t introduce similar features.
Potential Impact on Google Ads
Paid ads in local search results are crucial for clinics aiming to attract new patients. Google highlights these ads effectively in its local search layout, meaning clinics relying on paid search traffic may worry about a potential shift in search dynamics. However, considering SearchGPT’s limited volume, its focus on informational queries, and Google’s dominance in local search, it’s unlikely that clinics will experience an impact on paid search campaigns anytime soon.
Conclusion: Google’s Current Dominance in Local Search
AI-driven search engines like SearchGPT may be growing, but they currently don’t pose an immediate threat to the local visibility of clinics on Google. Google’s extensive reach—4.3 billion active weekly users—and its specialised features for commercial searches, such as maps, reviews, and business profiles, give it a clear advantage.
While it’s wise for clinics to monitor changes in AI search capabilities, Google remains the primary platform for capturing location-based traffic. For now, focusing SEO and advertising efforts on Google is the best way for clinics to maintain strong visibility in local searches.











